Tags streaming

The BBC’s New US Subscription Service Will Let You Stream As Much Doctor Who As You Want 

In another addition to the growing trend of dumping live TV on the internet, the BBC will be joining the fray by launching its own over-the-top (OTT) subscription service in the U.S. next year. This has me thinking one thing and one thing only...DOCTOR WHO!


Comments Off on The BBC’s New US Subscription Service Will Let You Stream As Much Doctor Who As You Want 


Darren Orf

September 17th


The New Amazon Fire TV Does 4K and Voice Commands For Just $100

“We decided not to mess with what’s working,” says Amazon devices VP Peter Larsen. That’s why his new Fire TV looks exactly the same. But inside this tiny box, you’ll find components powerful enough to stream 4K movies. It’s one more impulse buy from the kings of online shopping.


Comments Off on The New Amazon Fire TV Does 4K and Voice Commands For Just $100


Sean Hollister

September 17th


Opinion: It’s time to give movies and TV shows the Apple Music treatment

I don’t plan on subscribing to Apple Music when my free trial of the service runs out. It’s not really something I care to pay $10 a month for. I’m not an avid music listener; I sometimes put some hip hop on in the car, but that’s about it. For me, paying $10 every month for access to a large library of music that I don’t plan to use to the fullest extent just isn’t worth it, and I prefer to own what music I do listen to.

I also hate the idea of subscription software, like Adobe’s current Creative Cloud offering. Like my music, I’d rather own my software outright than pay a monthly fee to have access to it. The same is true for just about every other subscription service that’s out there.

So it might surprise you to find out that I think Apple should get into the TV and movie subscription business. What’s more, I’d be willing to pay every single month for access to that service. Why the difference of opinion on this topic? Keep reading and find out.

Screen vs. Speakers

One of the big differentiators between movies and music is the type of content that each one presents. Movies (and TV shows) tell a story that’s typically intended to be best received on its first viewing. In other words, once you’ve seen a movie or a show, you know what’s going to happen, and some of the drama, suspense, or surprise is taken out of it. Sure, you may say a movie is “just as good” on the second or third viewing, but in most cases, that’s just not going to be the case.

Music, on the other hand, doesn’t rely so much on drama and surprises to draw people in. A song or album truly can be “just as good” every time no matter how much you listen to it. It’s a whole different medium.

It makes sense to want to build a library of songs you enjoy, create playlists, and listen to the same songs many times over. With movies, unless it’s a real favorite, most people prefer to watch one just once or twice. The same usually goes for TV shows. One can binge-watch a series once, move on, go back and re-watch it again later, but eventually the show will get old.

So there’s a big difference in the “use case” for music versus movies and TV shows. How does that tie in to the idea of a movie subscription service?

For starters, it helps define how people would use the service, and what types of features it should offer. While Apple Music needs the ability to add songs to your library and create playlists, the chances of someone wanting to create a playlist of movies (aside from a Netflix style queue) don’t seem very high. Apple could forgo the parts of Apple Music that caused so many problems (the management) and opt for something much simpler.

Here’s what I propose: a streaming service that lets subscribers choose any movie or TV show from the iTunes Store and watch it. Subscribers could watch unlimited movies and TV shows whenever they want.

If that sounds an awful lot like Netflix, that might be because it is. The big difference between the two competitors then would be content. Apple has a much larger selection of new and current shows that Netflix just can’t match. In the same way that Apple Music subscribers are able to listen to new albums on release day, subscribers to this service would be able to watch new TV shows the day after they air, and new movies the day they release on iTunes.

By The Hour

“But, Mike,” I’m sure you’re thinking, “It’s not quite the same! Movies and TV shows are so much more expensive than music!” Glancing over the prices on the iTunes Store, you’d think so, wouldn’t you? Actually, as it turns out, that’s not the case at all.

To demonstrate how music is, in all seriousness, much more expensive than a TV series or movie let’s do a little bit of math. Bear with me here, because this is going to take a little time to explain, but it’s an important point in understanding why a service like this makes sense.

First, we’ll establish some basic references to use in our formula.

I looked at the prices of a few popular recent movie releases to determine what a likely price might be for a new release. Here’s what I found:

Given these numbers, it’s safe to say that unless a movie is set at a special price to drive sales (like Mad Max above), $20 is a reasonable asking price for a recently-released action blockbuster.

Based on the average lengths of movies and songs, let’s assume that every song is exactly four minutes long, and that every movie is exactly two hours long.

Now, let’s say you’ve got two hours to kill.

Assuming that you want to listen to a nice mix of artists and genres and don’t want to hear any songs repeated during your listening session, you’ll need to buy 15 songs to fill up your hour. At $1.29 a pop on iTunes (not buying full albums to ensure a mix of styles and artists), those songs will cost you $19.35 for one hour of listening.

The total you have to spend on music for two hours will come out to $38.70.

If the songs are shorter than four minutes, that price goes up even more. At three minutes a song, you’ll spend $25.80 per hour, or $51.16 for two hours.

Now compare that to a movie. Our two-hour movie costs $20 and fills up our entire break. That’s $18 lower than the price for enough music to fill the same period of time—nearly 50% cheaper.

The gap grows as those movies get cheaper. Picking up Mad Max: Fury Road would save you even more money, and grabbing a slightly older release like The Imitation Game would cut your price in half again—about a quarter of the total music price.

Let’s bring TV shows into the mix. I looked at prices for the most recent full seasons of four different shows on four different types of networks featured on the iTunes Store home page to get an idea of pricing:

Because TV shows have to make room for commercials, most episodes don’t come out to exactly 60 minutes. For The Walking Dead and The Blacklist, the actual runtime per episode is 43 minutes. For Homeland, it averages at around 50 minutes. Rick and Morty runs 22 minutes.

Using these numbers, I came up with the actual price-per-hour for each show:

  • The Walking Dead – $2.40
  • The Blacklist – $3.65
  • Homeland – $3
  • Rick and Morty – $5.40

The obvious outlier here is Rick and Morty, which is mostly due to the fact that Apple charges the same price for a 22-minute episode as a 43- or 50-minute episode.

For these same prices, you can get anywhere from 1-4 songs—not even enough to fill half an hour. Thus, it can be concluded that TV shows and movies actually cost a lot less than music per hour.

But of course, none of these are actually sold “by the hour,” so what does it matter? Quite a bit, when you’re talking about streaming. With the current model, your inability or unwillingness to pay for those additional songs or episodes can put a stop to your purchases.

With streaming, the only limiting factor is the amount of free time you have to watch your show or movie. If you have two hours, nothing can stop you from watching two full hours of TV

In essence, streaming media is being sold “by the hour.” You’re not paying for an individual movie, or episode, or even a season pass. You’re paying a flat rate for an all-you-can-watch entertainment buffet. Every episode and movie you watch makes the subscription a little more “worth it.”

So how does the fact that movies and TV shows are cheaper by the hour than music play into this? Well, basically it means content providers will be missing out on less money when people choose to subscribe instead of buy. When you listen to an hour of streaming music instead of buying, that’s $19.35 that could be divided up between Apple, the label, the artist, and other contributors. Instead, a much smaller number is shared between the involved parties.

For content with a lower overall cost to you, like a TV show, Apple, the studio, and other involved parties are missing out on a much lower number in the ballpark of $3, or $10 for a movie. That loss can likely be made up for by factoring in the number of people who will watch a show they might have skipped before because it now costs them nothing to do so.

There are some other interesting factors that would come into play with such a service that don’t impact the music industry. For example, people can’t watch movies while driving or at work, though many choose to listen to music at these times. As a result, there may not be enough hours in the day for movie and TV streaming to reach the same levels of usage that music does.

It could be argued that less content being streamed at the same subscription fee as a music service (or a higher fee) means a larger piece of the pie for those who get paid, which helps negate potential losses even more.

Financially, it seems there’s less risk in putting movies and TV shows on a streaming platform than music. With services like Netflix already doing just that with great success, slapping Apple’s logo on a similar offer could be just thing we need to push the cord-cutting movement into the mainstream.

Apple vs. Netflix

A service like this makes even more sense when you consider the launch of the major Apple TV revamp next month and recent rumors that Apple is trying to get into producing original content. Launching original shows like House of Cards was a big step for Netflix, and taking that same step could help Apple set itself apart from the competition.

So how would a service like this be priced? I’m not sure. Apple Music is $10 a month, and Netflix has three plans at $8, $9, and $11. It seems like $10 could be a competitive price point for Apple as well, though I’ll also say that I’d be willing to pay a bit more than that.

While some may suggest that Netflix’s price is possible because the service doesn’t carry all of the latest titles, and that Apple streaming those titles would allow them to boost the price, I’m not convinced. After all, Apple managed to keep its own music price competitive while still making better content deals than Spotify and others.

Whether premium cable networks like HBO and Showtime got on board with this idea could also impact the cost, but with each of those networks already offering their own standalone streaming platforms, their compliance wouldn’t be necessary to make this service a cord-cutter’s dream.

In fact, if Apple released this service next month, I’d strongly consider dropping Netflix immediately. The only thing holding me back, ironically, would be Netflix’s original content. That’s the reason Netflix makes shows, after all: to lock people in so they don’t want to leave. Maybe that’s why Apple wants to create its own series, too. I certainly hope so.


Filed under: Apple TV, Opinion Tagged: Apple TV, iTunes, movies, Netflix, streaming, TV shows

For more news on iTunes, Apple TV, and Opinion continue reading at 9to5Mac.

What do you think? Discuss "Opinion: It’s time to give movies and TV shows the Apple Music treatment" with our community.

Comments Off on Opinion: It’s time to give movies and TV shows the Apple Music treatment


Mike Beasley

September 13th



Spotify’s ‘Found Them First’ Tool Calculates Your Musical Cool

In the days of physical records, you could simply shrug and claim to have known a band before they were big. But with digital streaming comes cold, hard evidence of when you first listened to a band — and Spotify now lets you use it to work out if your bragging is accurate.


Comments Off on Spotify’s ‘Found Them First’ Tool Calculates Your Musical Cool


Jamie Condliffe

September 9th


Stream the First Colbert Late Show For Free, Legally

Even if you’ve already ditched live TV in favor of Netflix binges, you’ll probably want to watch Stephen Colbert’s first night hosting The Late Show.


Comments Off on Stream the First Colbert Late Show For Free, Legally


Chris Mills

September 9th


Wow, Spotify’s New Privacy Policy is Atrocious

There’s a new privacy policy going into effect with the latest Spotify update, and the TL;DR version is that if you’re at all concerned about data privacy you might want to jump ship now.


Comments Off on Wow, Spotify’s New Privacy Policy is Atrocious


Maddie Stone

August 20th


Apple says only 21% of people opting out of free Apple Music trial before expiration

Taylor Swift Apple Music iPhone 6 Beats 21

Earlier today a new survey over Apple Music usage surfaced with data over Apple’s new venture into the streaming music space, and Apple has decided to respond (vaguely) to at least one data point. MusicWatch’s survey results said that some 61 percent of its participants have turned off the auto-renew function on Apple Music, hinting that they would not be paying subscribers after the three-month free trial period. With the message being potentially interpreted that only 39 percent of current Apple Music users planning to become paid users this fall, Apple has responded to the survey by clarifying (somewhat) that a higher 79 percent of users that started the trial are continuing to use it, leaving only 21 percent of Apple’s 11 million subscribers as defectors.

The response (via The Verge) doesn’t exactly say a whole lot about Apple Music’s usage data, however, as it’s unclear what Apple qualifies as still using the service.

MusicWatch’s question specifically asked how many participants turned off the auto-renew feature which is required to keep an active account after the trial, but it’s likely some users disabled it before forming an opinion on Apple Music simply to avoid an unexpected $10-$15 charge three months down the road.

There’s also the lack of clarity about what exactly Apple means when it describes the 70 percent of active users. Are users still opening the Music app? Still engaging with Apple Music’s specific features? Still playing Beats 1 which is free and doesn’t require Apple Music? Apple also told New York Post reporter Claire Atkinson that 79 percent of people who trailed it are using on a weekly basis.

Finally, there’s naturally a disadvantage for data received from a limited survey of Apple Music participants versus the whole wealth of usage data Apple can view. Whereas MusicMatch’s survey may be accurate and should be somewhat representative of the larger picture, the variances in measuring an active user that plans to convert to a paid subscriber after the trial period makes the two data points fairly apples to oranges. Still, it’s clear Apple viewed that metric alone as not fitting its own narrative on Apple Music as it continues its launch campaign for the streaming music service.


Filed under: Apple Music Tagged: Apple Music, streaming, survey

For more information about Apple Music, Apple Music, and streaming continue reading at 9to5Mac.

What do you think? Discuss "Apple says only 21% of people opting out of free Apple Music trial before expiration" with our community.

Comments Off on Apple says only 21% of people opting out of free Apple Music trial before expiration


Zac Hall

August 18th



The Only Thing I’ll Miss About Cable Is My DVR

As far as watching TV goes, the experience provided by a traditional cable provider is shit. Slow hardware, clunky interfaces, unwanted bundled channels. Streaming services are slowly replacing all of this and thanks goodness for them. But there’s an aspect of the old way that I will sorely miss—the DVR and its magical commercial skipping powers.


Comments Off on The Only Thing I’ll Miss About Cable Is My DVR


Michael Hession

August 14th


Bloomberg: Apple’s streaming TV service delayed into 2016 but more powerful Apple TV hardware still coming next month

Screen Shot 2015-08-13 at 5.21.37 PM

While Apple is expected to unveil a new Apple TV set-top box at an event next month, its rumored web TV service will not make an appearance at that event according to a new report out of Bloomberg. The report says that Apple, while it originally wanted to launch its streaming TV service this year, has decided to push the service back until some point in 2016.

The report claims that talks with major TV networks such as CBS and 21st Century Fox are progressing, but at a very slow place. Apple is also worried that it does not yet have the computer network capacity in place to ensure a quality viewing experience for the user, the report claims. The company still plans, however, to launch a new, more powerful set-top box.

Apple wants to offer its web TV service, which will include a package of popular channels, for $40 a month, a price that it’s having a hard time convincing networks to come on board for.  With that said, however, TV programmers are expecting to receive more money from Apple’s new web TV service than they do from existing cable and satellite TV partners because the service is new to the market and is attempting to gain share. Another problem Apple is facing is deciding the appropriate mix of channels to offer for $40 per month to please the most viewers. An earlier report claimed that Apple was aiming to offer 25+ channels as part of the package.

Apple is expected to hold an event on September 9th to introduce a new Apple TV and refreshed iPhone models.

Filed under: iOS Devices Tagged: Apple, Apple TV, streaming

Check out 9to5Mac for more breaking coverage of iOS Devices, Apple, and Apple TV.

What do you think? Discuss "Bloomberg: Apple’s streaming TV service delayed into 2016 but more powerful Apple TV hardware still coming next month" with our community.

Comments Off on Bloomberg: Apple’s streaming TV service delayed into 2016 but more powerful Apple TV hardware still coming next month


Chance Miller

August 13th



How a Mail-Order Music Scam Taught Me to Steal

It’s hard to say exactly when I learned how to steal music. At first, I think it happened when I learned how to torrent. Then I recall my late nights with Napster. But if I really think hard about it, I remember middle school and Columbia House and that incredible eight CDs for a penny deal. That’s when I started stealing.


Comments Off on How a Mail-Order Music Scam Taught Me to Steal


Adam Clark Estes

August 11th

October 2015
« Sep