Tags lawsuit

Equifax is already facing the largest class-action lawsuit ‘in US history’

Equifax hack: lawsuit

Hmm, who could have seen this coming? Less than 24 hours after Equifax revealed that all of its customers' personal info had been plundered by hackers, the company is facing a multi-billion-dollar consumer lawsuit, and an investigation by at least one state attorney general.

The proposed class-action lawsuit was filed in Portland, Oregon federal court. In the suit, users allege that Equifax was negligent in its protection of data, and chose to save money rather than safeguard customer data.

Continue reading...

Trending right now:

  1. Over 59,000 people are pointing fans at Hurricane Irma in an attempt to blow it away
  2. The sun is acting pretty strange right now
  3. Sorry, but T-Mobile’s new Netflix offer isn’t the great deal T-Mobile makes it out to be

Comments Off on Equifax is already facing the largest class-action lawsuit ‘in US history’

Photo

Chris Mills

September 8th

Uncategorized

It’s official: Uber is in crisis

Uber lawsuit against Travis Kalanick

Literally hours after we published a (very long!) list of all the execs who have jumped ship from Uber this year, more bad news landed about Uber's management situation. Benchmark Capital, a venture capital firm that was an early investor in Uber and holds a seat on the board, has sued Travis Kalanick, Uber's founder and recently-ousted CEO.

The suit, scooped by Axios, alleges breach of contract and fiduciary duty by Kalanick. Basically, Benchmark is accusing Kalanick of pulling strings to try and stack the board in his favor, and eventually orchestrate a triumphant return as Uber's CEO.

Continue reading...

Trending right now:

  1. New video showcases how the iPhone 8 stacks up against the iPhone 7s Plus
  2. Samsung’s revolutionary Note 8 will steal a feature from 2015’s hottest phone
  3. Trust us, this $15 gadget will be the best thing that ever happened to your HDTV

Comments Off on It’s official: Uber is in crisis

Photo

Chris Mills

August 10th

Uncategorized

Apple’s fight with Qualcomm could hurt the iPhone 8

Apple Qualcomm lawsuit

Apple has been locked in a bitter dispute with Qualcomm, a major chip manufacturer that has historically supplied the wireless modems for the iPhone. According to a new report, Apple's legal dispute with Qualcomm is going to have an effect on iPhone 8 components, and Apple might have to substitute some Qualcomm chips with Intel components. Given the inferior quality of the Intel chips in last year's iPhone 7, that's not good news.

Continue reading...

Trending right now:

  1. Samsung’s about to launch a new version of the Galaxy S8
  2. How the iPhone 8 will look next to the iPhone 7, the Google Pixel and other top phones
  3. This is how much the safe Galaxy Note 7 might cost you

Comments Off on Apple’s fight with Qualcomm could hurt the iPhone 8

Photo

Chris Mills

June 1st

Apple

Bizarre Beijing ruling says iPhone 6 copies Chinese phone, Apple must halt sales

Bloomberg reports a Beijing Intellectual Property Office ruling that the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus violate the design patent of a Chinese phone, and that Apple must cease sales of both models within the city.

The iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus infringe on Shenzhen Baili’s patent rights because of similarities to its 100C phone, the Beijing Intellectual Property Office wrote in its decision. Apple, whose iconic gadgets helped define the modern smartphone industry, didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Bizarre intellectual property rulings are not unusual in China – witness Apple losing the exclusive right to the iPhone trademark there last month – but this one does appear to set a new record, as the iPhone 6 looks nothing like the Baili 100C …

more…


Filed under: iOS Devices Tagged: Baili 100C, Beijing Intellectual Property Office, china, iPhone 6, Lawsuit

Comments Off on Bizarre Beijing ruling says iPhone 6 copies Chinese phone, Apple must halt sales

Photo

Ben Lovejoy

June 17th

Apple

Mac

Apple hit with dumbest patent troll claims yet: ‘iPhone makes phone calls & sends emails’

Patent trolls – companies that buy old patents purely to sue companies for claimed infringements – love to get their hands on very generic patents, as those give them the maximum number of possible targets. But Texas-based Corydoras Technologies LLC wins the prize for the dumbest claims yet against Apple. It is alleging, among other things, that the iPhone infringes its patents by making phone calls and sending emails …

more…


Filed under: AAPL Company, iOS Devices Tagged: Corydoras Technologies LLC, iPad, iPhone, Lawsuit, Patent, Patent troll, Texas Eastern District Court

Comments Off on Apple hit with dumbest patent troll claims yet: ‘iPhone makes phone calls & sends emails’

Photo

Ben Lovejoy

May 23rd

Apple

Mac

Apple agrees to pay $24.9M to settle Siri patent lawsuit, but it may not end there

Apple has agreed to pay $24.9M to settle a long-running lawsuit alleging that Siri violated a patent owned by a New York institute and exclusively licensed to a company in Dallas. The patent predates the launch of Siri by four years.

The Albany Business Review notes that Apple was sued not by the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, which holds the patent, but by Dallas-based Dynamic Advances, which licensed it. The company reportedly receives $5M now, and the balance after meeting unspecified conditions. In return, Apple gets a license to use the patented technology for three years.

The settlement means that the patent trial, due to take place in New York next month, will no longer proceed. However, that may not be the end of it …

more…


Filed under: iOS Devices Tagged: Dynamic Advances, Lawsuit, Nuance, Nuance Communications, Patent, Rensselaer, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Siri, Siri lawsuit

Comments Off on Apple agrees to pay $24.9M to settle Siri patent lawsuit, but it may not end there

Photo

Ben Lovejoy

April 20th

Apple

Mac

After Apple Music launch, fans sue Kanye West over Tidal exclusivity promise

After bringing his new album to Apple Music and Spotify, fans are suing Kanye West claiming they purchased subscriptions to West-backed music app Tidal on the promise the album would be exclusive to the service.

more…


Filed under: Apple Music Tagged: Apple Music, Class action, exclusive, kanye west, Lawsuit, subscription, Tidal

Comments Off on After Apple Music launch, fans sue Kanye West over Tidal exclusivity promise

Photo

Jordan Kahn

April 18th

Apple

Mac

Judge rejects class-action over AppleCare’s subpar replacements, calls lawyer ‘manifestly incompetent’

Apple-Care

Remember that class-action lawsuit alleging AppleCare+ customers were being given subpar replacement products? This week a federal judge rejected the case while calling the plantiffs’ lawyer “manifestly incompetent” and suggesting the counsel orchestrated the entire case.

ArsTechnica reports the judge’s rejection this week claimed the lawyer encouraged the plaintiffs to purchase AppleCare plans and record interactions with Apple employees “for the purpose of initiating this lawsuit.”

But none of the plaintiffs were disgruntled consumers who went looking for a lawyer after getting bad service. Galindo was a paralegal for Renee Kennedy, the lawyer who filed the lawsuit, and Adkins had also worked for Kennedy in the past. Kennedy gave them both “monetary gifts to thank them for their excellent work,” and both women used those “gifts” to buy AppleCare Plus, referred to as “AC+” in court papers.

While the case isn’t entirely over, it won’t be a class-action and therefore will likely be on a much smaller scale than it might have been otherwise (if it doesn’t eventually get thrown out altogether).

Under Apple’s current policy for AppleCare plans, the company promises to “exchange the Covered Equipment with a replacement product that is new or equivalent to new in performance and reliability, and is at least functionally equivalent to the original product.” It’s not always the case — the judge found one plaintiff in the case was actually given a brand new device as a replacement — that’s another way of saying you might get refurbished replacement units (or parts for repairs).


Filed under: AAPL Company Tagged: Apple, AppleCare, Class action, Lawsuit, Refurbished

For more news on AAPL Company, Apple, and Lawsuit continue reading at 9to5Mac.

What do you think? Discuss "Judge rejects class-action over AppleCare’s subpar replacements, calls lawyer ‘manifestly incompetent’" with our community.

Comments Off on Judge rejects class-action over AppleCare’s subpar replacements, calls lawyer ‘manifestly incompetent’

Photo

Jordan Kahn

January 8th

Apple

Mac

Biometric company’s lawsuit accuses Apple of underhand tactics to gain access to heart-rate tech for Apple Watch

heartrate

Biometric specialist Valencell – whose technology is licensed by iRiver, LG, Sony and others – has filed a lawsuit accusing Apple of using underhand tactics to gain access to its patented technology for use in the Apple Watch.

The company claims that Apple violated three of its patents for improving the accuracy and reliability of heart-rate data when using the photoplethysmography (PPG) approach used in the Apple Watch. But the lawsuit alleges more than just patent infringement, reports AI: it also claims that Apple used deceptive techniques to get access to the technology …

Specifically, it suggests that Apple feigned interest in a partnership agreement with Valencell, and that IP addresses belonging to Apple were used to download white papers using fake contact details.

 Apple […] obtained such white papers by providing fictitious information. On March 27, 2013 and May 5, 2014, one or more Apple agents downloaded the “PerformTek Precision Biometrics: Engaging the Burgeoning Mobile Health and Fitness Market” white paper from Valencell using fictitious names. On March 10, 2014 and April 23, 2015, one or more Apple agents downloaded the “Earbud-Based Sensor for the Assessment of Energy Expenditure, Heart Rate, and VO2 max” white paper from Valencell using fictitious names. On April 1, 2015 an Apple agent downloaded the “Earbud-Based Sensor for the Assessment of Energy Expenditure, Heart Rate, and VO2 max” white paper from Valencell using a fictitious

It alleges that seven Apple employees did this. The lawsuit names these individuals, and says that all seven not only worked on the Apple Watch, but were specifically involved in development of the heart-rate sensor.

A separate lawsuit makes similar allegations against Fitbit for technology used in the Charge HR and Surge.

In the run-up to the launch of the Watch, Apple focused attention on the advanced heart-rate monitoring capabilities of the device, whose accuracy has been found to rival dedicated monitors. The company adjusted the behaviour of the heart-rate monitor in watchOS 1.0.1.

We have invited Apple to comment on the allegations and will update with any response received.


Filed under: Apple Watch Tagged: Apple Inc, Apple watch, Fitbit, fitness, Health, heart rate, Lawsuit, Valencell

Visit 9to5Mac to find more special coverage of Apple watch, Apple Watch, and Apple Inc.

What do you think? Discuss "Biometric company’s lawsuit accuses Apple of underhand tactics to gain access to heart-rate tech for Apple Watch" with our community.

Comments Off on Biometric company’s lawsuit accuses Apple of underhand tactics to gain access to heart-rate tech for Apple Watch

Photo

Ben Lovejoy

January 5th

Apple

Mac

Apple hit with class action lawsuit over iOS 9’s performance on older iPhones

ios-9-features

In a new class action lawsuit, Apple is being accused of deceptive trade practices and false advertising due to its claims of iOS 9 being compatible with older iOS devices, primarily the iPhone 4s. The lawsuit claims that iOS “significantly interferes” with the performance of the iPhone 4s and that Apple is in the wrong for not allow users to downgrade to older versions of the operating system.

The lawsuit, which has more than 100 backers, goes as far to say that the iPhone 4s was rendered essentially unusable by the iOS 9 update (via AI). The members of the suit claim that app performance, of both first- and third-party apps, was hindered by the update, as was general device performance and touchscreen responsiveness. Some members claim they experienced freezes and crashes, as well.

The actual performance of the device is just the beginning of the suit, however. The lawsuit asserts that Apple, through “internal testing and/or through other means,” was aware of the effects iOS 9 would have on the iPhone 4s, yet it went through with the update and even advertised things like increased performance and battery life as improvements in the update. The plaintiffs argue that Apple should have at least warned iPhone 4s owners of the potential issues.

It doesn’t stop there, however. The suit goes on to argue that because of the iOS ecosystem, users are far more likely to buy a new iOS device than switch to a competition platform like Android. The plaintiffs argue that users don’t want to reinvest in nontransferable content such as apps.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are seeking more than $5 million in damages.

iOS 9 was criticized across the board when it first launched for slowing down even the newest generation devices. In our poll, 43 percent of some 33,000 responders said their iPhone was “significantly slower after the update.” iOS 9.1, however, claimed to fix that issue for most. The plaintiffs in this case, however, argue that the primary issue is “planned obsolescence” on Apple’s part.


Filed under: iOS, iOS Devices Tagged: Apple, iOS 9, iPhone 4S, Lawsuit, legal

For more information about iOS Devices, Apple, and iOS continue reading at 9to5Mac.

What do you think? Discuss "Apple hit with class action lawsuit over iOS 9’s performance on older iPhones" with our community.

Comments Off on Apple hit with class action lawsuit over iOS 9’s performance on older iPhones

Photo

Chance Miller

December 30th

Apple

Mac
line
October 2017
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031